Mass Tort brief
Gelato Sugar Claims, Teva US Defense, and SodaStream Settlement
Israeli courts advance major food labeling and subscriber suits while Teva scores a key US preemption victory.
Mass Tort
A Lod court approved a NIS 350M class action against Golda for mislabeling sugar-free gelato — exposing Israel's dominant ice cream chain to severe financial liability.
BackgroundIsraeli consumer protection regulations strictly limit sugar-free claims on food products to protect diabetic consumers and maintain clear labeling standards. Golda operates over 100 franchise locations across Israel and built its market reputation on artisanal gelato offerings.
- Laboratory testing showed Golda's sugar-free flavors contained 6.6 grams of lactose per 100 grams, far above the 0.5 gram regulatory threshold for sugar-free claims.
- District Judge Iris Rabinovitch-Brun rejected Golda's legal defense that sugar-free marketing meant no added sugar, holding that statutory definitions protect consumers from all natural sugars.
- The suit seeks NIS 350 million in damages for false advertising and health misrepresentation, threatening significant financial exposure for Israel's largest ice cream chain.
Mass Tort
Teva knocked out key Paragard failure-to-warn claims using federal preemption — giving the drugmaker vital legal leverage before broader US bellwether trials begin.
BackgroundDual-listed Teva Pharmaceuticals faces thousands of US product liability lawsuits in federal multidistrict litigation alleging Paragard devices break during removal. Federal preemption rulings provide a critical defense mechanism when federal safety labels conflict with state-level design defect claims.
- The US District Court in New Jersey dismissed plaintiff failure-to-warn claims with prejudice, blocking state law tort actions against Teva's copper IUD device.
- Defense counsel successfully obtained court sanctions against plaintiff expert witnesses over unreliable testimony regarding alternative product design defects.
- The ruling insulates Teva from individual state court liabilities ahead of broader federal bellwether trials, strengthening its negotiating leverage in overall multidistrict settlement talks.
Mass Tort
SodaStream resolved a customer dispute over gas cylinder balance restrictions — providing NIS 2.9M in warranty extensions without denting PepsiCo's broader balance sheet.
BackgroundSodaStream operates extensive distribution in Israel providing home carbonation machines and gas cylinder refill subscriptions for local households. Consumer protection disputes over auto-renewals and non-refundable subscription balances have faced increased scrutiny from Israeli courts.
- Plaintiffs alleged that SodaStream restricted customer gas cylinder allowances near annual contract expiration dates, effectively forcing subscribers into unwanted contract renewals.
- Under the approved court agreement, SodaStream will compensate approximately 58,000 Israeli subscription holders by extending product warranty coverage across its domestic customer base.
- The NIS 2.9 million compromise resolves the long-running consumer dispute without causing material financial or operational disruption to parent corporation PepsiCo.
Unlock the full brief
Sign in to read every signal, takeaway, and source. Free account — Apple, Google, or email.
